Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20269 (AP)

Gadicherla Venkata Durga Rao v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/10714/2013 · 2026-02-18

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010201762013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10714/2013 Between: 1. GADICHERLA VENKATA DURGA RAO, S/O NARAYANA AGED 36 YEARS, OCCP: CLERK, (HALL TICKETNO 1403045112) JEELUGUMILLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KOPANATI SRINIVAS, S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED 44 YEARS, OCCP: CLERK,( HALL TICKET NO 1403045125) KORUMAMIDI PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED. NIDADAVOLU MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. CHIKKALA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SATYAM AGED 42 YEARS, OCCP: CLERK,( HALL TICKET NO 1403015049) MAGGULLA L.S.C.S. GHANAPAVARAM MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SATTI SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY AGED 42 YEARS , OCCP SECRETARY,( HALL TICKET NO 1403014974) INAPARRU PRIMARY AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED. RENUGONDA MANDAL,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GRUHAKALPA, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, ELURU,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 4. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, TROOP BAZAR, HYDERABAD REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (HRD) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. L V S NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI 2. KOMATIREDDY VENKATANARASIMHA REDDY 3. K BHARAT RAM 4. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further adjudication on merits. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.19.02.2026 SR