[2026:RJ-JP:1688] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15930/2025 1. Suresh S/o Chitarmal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Gogawas Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 2. Subhash S/o Girdhari, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Gogawas Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Anoop Pareek Mr. Pranav Pareek & Mr. Kshitiz Sharma Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/01/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.0400/2024 registered with the Police Station, Dantaramgarh, District Sikar for offence under Sections 189(2), 329(3), 126(2), 115(2) & 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsels for the complainant and also perused the case diary. [2026:RJ-JP:1688] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15930/2025] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that initially the accused party has lodged a report against the complainant party and so as to create pressure, the present criminal case has been lodged. He also submitted that earlier also four criminal cases have been lodged by the accused party against the complainant party. 5. As per the Medico Legal Report (in short ‘MLR’), the injured Jamna Devi is said to have sustained two injuries and both the injuries have been opined to be grievous in nature, injured Govindaram has sustained the injuries which are simple in nature by blunt weapon and the injured Laxman has sustained three injuries, out of which one injury has been opined to be grievous in nature. 6. On going through the statements of the injured witnesses, there are allegations against the present petitioners of inflicting injuries. 7. Taking into consideration the number and nature of the injuries sustained by the injured complainant party and the allegation against the present petitioners levelled by the injured persons in their statements recorded by the Police, this Court is not inclined to entertain this anticipatory bail application. 8. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENAJ ARTI SHARMA /276