Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20267 (AP)

T.CH.Venkateshwarlu v. Shri Singh Surinder

CC/1837/2013 · 2026-03-31

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010202282013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1837/2013 Between: 1.T.CH.VENKATESHWARLU, S/O. T.VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RETD ASSISTANT GR-III (DEPOT)(FCI) H.NO.32/42/3/18, MARUTHI NAGAR, COCA-COLA STREET, VIJAYAWADA-4. ...PETITIONER AND 1.SHRI SINGH SURINDER, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED: NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/ZONAL MANAGER (SOUTH ZONE) ZONAL OFFICE, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA NO.3, HADDOWS ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 006. 2.SHRI KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED: NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS GENERAL MANAGER/REGIONAL MANAGER AP REGION), FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, HACA BHAVAN, III FLOOR, PUBLIC GARDEN ROAD, HYDERABAD - 500 004. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the respondents under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for intentionally and deliberately violating the orders of this Hon'ble court passed in W.P.M.P NO: 17204 of 2010 IN W.P.NO: 17728 of 2003 dated 7.7.2010, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.1837 of 2013 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.17728 of 2003 was allowed by this Court by an order dated 30.12.2013. In view of the said order, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:01.04.2026 KGM 3 23 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO:1837 of 2013 Date: 01.04.2026 KGM