Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20264 (AP)

TIRUVEEDHULA USHA SWARNA GOWRI & ANO. v. PRL. SECY., M.A. DEPT. & 6 ORS.

WP/13203/2014 · 2026-03-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010209692014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 13203/2014 Between: 1. TIRUVEEDHULA USHA SWARNA GOWRI & ANO., W/O TIRUVEEDHULA VENUGOPAL, AGED: 44 YEARS, 0CC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. HIG-209, 1ST FLOOR, HB COLONY, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. TIRUVEEDHULA VENUGOPAL, S/O. VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, AGED: 49 YEARS, 0CC: BUSINESS R/O. HIG-209, 1ST FLOOR, HB COLONY, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12 KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA. 3. MEDA NAGA VENKATA SUJATHA, W/O VENKATA RAJDENDRA PRASAD @ RAJU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 0CC: BUSINESS, R/O H.NO. 1-3-23/4/2A, 1ST FLOOR, 5TH LANE, CEMENT ROAD, VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYWADA-12, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. MEDA VENKATA RAJENDRA PRASAD RAJU, S/O SATYANARAYANA, R/O H.NO. 1-3-23/4/2A, 1ST FLOOR, 5TH LANE, CEMENT ROAD, VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYWADA-12, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. MAJETI VENKATA KRISHNA PRASAD, S/O SATYANARAYANA, R/O H.NO. 1-3/24-30, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVIND STREET, 2 VIDHYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYWADA-12, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. TRIVEEDULA KISHORE KUMAR, S/O VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, C/O BHASKAR TEXTILES, VASTRALATHA, SHOP NO. 179(A), 1ST FLOOR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. MEDA LAXMI MADHURI, W/O SRINIVASA VARADARAJULA GUPTA R/O H.NO. 76-8/2-1, MAHAM MANDIR ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M S TIRUMALA RANI 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 3. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: When this Writ Petition was listed on 18.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. 2. Having noted the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:31.03.2026 Vns