2026:JHHC:20991 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5712 of 2026 Samir Ansari, son of late Sarif Ansari … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 06/15.07.2026 A counter-affidavit has been filed during the court proceedings, which is taken on record. 2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Cyber Case No. 39 of 2026 arising out of Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(1)(iii), 318(4), 319(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, sections 66(B)(C) and (D) of the Information Technology Act and section 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunication Act, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier on 14.05.2026 in B.A. No. 3421 of 2026, but by that time charge-sheet was not submitted. He submits that the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The learned counsel submits that now charge has been framed on 25.05.2026. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2026 having no criminal antecedent. He submits that one mobile is alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and no victim linking the petitioner with the recovered mobile has been found. 6. Learned counsel for the opposite party – State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid 2026:JHHC:20991 2 submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet having already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Cyber Case No. 39 of 2026 arising out of Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:15.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading: 15.07.2026