INDU DEVI Versus PUSHAP RAJ CRMPM-1541 of 2026 17.08.2026 Present: Mr. Lokesh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. CRMPM-1541 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation. Having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on account of the circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant/petitioner and as such, delay in filing the petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No._______ of 2026 Be registered. Notice to respondent be issued, on taking steps within two days, returnable within four weeks. Record be called for. Cr.MP No._____ of 2026 (CRMPST/7198/2026) Be registered. Notice in aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, be filed on or before the next date of hearing. In the meantime, substantive sentence imposed by the learned Court below shall remain suspended, subject to applicant/petitioner’s depositing 50% of the compensation amount, which shall also include the amount, if any, already deposited and furnishing personal bonds in the sum of ₹50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court within a period of six weeks. August 17, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge