Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20256 (RAJ)

AKASH @ ALVENDRA S/O SUKHVENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15963/2025 · 2026-01-09

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:848] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15963/2025 Akash @ Alvendra S/o Sukhvendra, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Nagla Gopal, P.s. Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.). (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mritunjya Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.715/2025 registered at Police Station Mathuragate, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 3, 25(6) of Arms Act, 1959 and 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no firearm was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He contends that other co-accused Shiva has been enlarged on bail by trial Court itself on 24.11.2025. Though five cases were shown as antecedents against the petitioner, but he has been acquitted in two of those cases. He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 18.11.2025. The trial of the case will take [2026:RJ-JP:848] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15963/2025] considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Akash @ Alvendra S/o Sukhvendra, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/97