SUNNY v. COMMISSIONER CGST COMMISSIONERATE LUDHIANA AND ANR
CWP/4434/2026 · 2026-05-18
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20255 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20255 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE H SUNNY
COMMISSION ANR
CORAM : HO
HO Present : Mr
Ms
for
M
Ms
for
DEEPAK SIBA
Lea petition was file but since during which final orde being CWP-127 with liberty to p
Dis
Pen
18.05.2026 Prince
Whether reportable Whether Reasoned:
Sr. No.145+333
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH
CM-3202
CWP-443 Date of D
Versus SIONER, CGST COMMISSIONERA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPIT Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Shruti Garg, Advocate
for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Senior Standing Ms. Himanshi Gautam, Advocate for the respondents.
*** SIBAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitione as filed to challenge therein show cau during the pendency of this petition f al order has been challenged through a 12775-2026, he be permitted to w ty to pursue CWP-12775-2026. Dismissed as withdrawn with libert Pending application(s), if any, shall
(DEEPAK
JU
(LAPITA
JU rtable : Yes/No
soned: Yes/No
JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 3202-CWP-2026 in/and 4434-2026
te of Decision : 18.05.2026
…PETITIONER NERATE, LUDHIANA AND
…RESPONDENTS DEEPAK SIBAL APITA BANERJI and
anding Counsel with cate
titioner submits that the present ow cause notice dated 09.12.2025 tition final order has been passed, ough a subsequently filed petition to withdraw the present petition liberty as prayed for. , shall also stand disposed of.
EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
PITA BANERJI) JUDGE
PRINCE SAINI 2026.05.19 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document