Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20255 (PNJ)

SUNNY v. COMMISSIONER CGST COMMISSIONERATE LUDHIANA AND ANR

CWP/4434/2026 · 2026-05-18

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE H SUNNY COMMISSION ANR CORAM : HO HO Present : Mr Ms for M Ms for DEEPAK SIBA Lea petition was file but since during which final orde being CWP-127 with liberty to p Dis Pen 18.05.2026 Prince Whether reportable Whether Reasoned: Sr. No.145+333 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CM-3202 CWP-443 Date of D Versus SIONER, CGST COMMISSIONERA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPIT Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Shruti Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Senior Standing Ms. Himanshi Gautam, Advocate for the respondents. *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitione as filed to challenge therein show cau during the pendency of this petition f al order has been challenged through a 12775-2026, he be permitted to w ty to pursue CWP-12775-2026. Dismissed as withdrawn with libert Pending application(s), if any, shall (DEEPAK JU (LAPITA JU rtable : Yes/No soned: Yes/No JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 3202-CWP-2026 in/and 4434-2026 te of Decision : 18.05.2026 …PETITIONER NERATE, LUDHIANA AND …RESPONDENTS DEEPAK SIBAL APITA BANERJI and anding Counsel with cate titioner submits that the present ow cause notice dated 09.12.2025 tition final order has been passed, ough a subsequently filed petition to withdraw the present petition liberty as prayed for. , shall also stand disposed of. EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE PITA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2026.05.19 16:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document