Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20253 (KAR)

SRI B P VISHWANATH v. THE SECRETARY

WP/1222/2022 · 2026-06-10

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27745 WP No. 1222 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B.P.VISHWANATH, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O LATE B.M.PUTTAGANGAPPA, BETTAHALSUR POST, BANGALORE NORTH - 562 157. 2. SRI. B.P.MAHESH, S/O LATE B.M.PUTTAGANGAPPA, AGED 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.810, 14TH MAIN, 13TH CROSS, 'A' SECTOR, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 064. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V.MOHAN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY, THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, FCS AND CA DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, NO.8, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, SAHAKARA BHAVAN, BANGALORE - 560 052. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27745 WP No. 1222 of 2022 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS BY REVISING THE TENDER CONDITIONS UNDER CLAUSE 5(v) DISQUALIFICATION IN THE TENDER NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-2 ANNEXURE-A NOTIFICATION DATED 24.12.2021 AS AN ENCROACHMENT UPON THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE TENDER BIDDERS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER On 8.6.2026, following order was passed: " None appears for the petitioners. Learned AGA submits that the tender was initially awarded for a period of two years with an option to extend the same for six months. That though there was no interim order, this Court by order dated 04.07.2022 had observed that the tender process would be subject to result of the petition. He further submits that in view of the passage of time, petition has rendered itself infructuous. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, list this matter on 10.06.2026 for the say of the petitioners." There is no representation even today. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE HR