[2026:RJ-JP:15134] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 3803/2026 Yunus S/o Rafiq, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Kanchanner Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 10/04/2026 1. This Court vide order dated 01.04.2026 directed the Investigating Officer to send the F.S.L. report of the cell-phone as seized by them. 2. Today learned Public Prosecutor informed this Court that although the Cell Phone were seized but the same has not been sent for FSL until now and the authorities are in the process of do- ing so. 3. This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner Yunus S/o Rafiq, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.334/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313, 61(2) (A) of B.N.S. and Section 66D & 67A of the IT Act. [2026:RJ-JP:15134] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-3803/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first bail application was withdrawn by the petitioner vide order dated 17.12.2025 with liberty to file a fresh bail application after filing of the charge-sheet, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this second bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. 5. Learned counsel further submits that the Police, after completing the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No.3801/2026 (Kaif & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan) vide order dated 02.04.2026 and the petitioner is behind the bar since long. Learned counsel further submits that though there are allegations against the petitioner, however, there is nothing on record to justify for the same. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. This Court after considering the nature of allegations, charge-sheet has already been filed and no recovery is required to be made, the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, the petitioner is behind the bar since long and also considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner Yunus S/o Rafiq on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:15134] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-3803/2026] 7. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Yunus S/o Rafiq shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- 1. The accused-petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused- petitioner shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclos- ing the following details: - (i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioner has in their name. (ii) The accused-petitioner shall submit complete transaction statements of all of their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the Investigating Officer. 3. The accused-petitioner shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer. 4. The accused-petitioner shall surrender his passport, if he has, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court. 5. The accused-petitioner shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of [2026:RJ-JP:15134] (4 of 5) [CRLMB-3803/2026] anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of Investigating Officer. 6. The accused-petitioner shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order. 7. The accused-petitioner shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioner. 8. The accused-petitioner shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer. 9. The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer. 10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused- petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. 11. The accused-petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation. 12. The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence, influ- ence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever. [2026:RJ-JP:15134] (5 of 5) [CRLMB-3803/2026] In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by Investigating Officer, shall be treated as a violation of the bail con- ditions, & further if the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Monika/1