SRI KOTHIM KHADAR, EG DISTRICT v. COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, HYD & ANOTHER
WP/12816/2013 · 2026-02-04
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20248 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20248 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010205782013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12816/2013 Between:
1. SRI KOTHIM KHADAR, EG DISTRICT, SON OF MANGARAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: SECURITY GUARD, SRI TALUPULAMMA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM, LOVA, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS HYD
ANOTHER, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONERCUMEXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI TALUPULAMMA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM, LOVA, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the Proceedings in Rc.No.A1/ 108/2013 dated 20.02.2013 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and set aside the same by directing the respondents to continue the petitioner in service till he attains the age of 60 years as per Rule 9 of the A.P. Charitable Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Office Holders and Servants Service Rules, 2000; and pass.
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 1664 OF 2013
2
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt: 25/04/2013 made in WP.No.12816/2013 IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 15775 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to continue the petitioner in service, pending disposal of the Writ Petition or till he attains the age of 60 years; and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVAS KARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V T M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS
2. V T M PRASAD
3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further.
2. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
05.02.2026 RMD
4
214
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 12816/2013
05.02.2026 RMD