[2026:RJ-JP:79] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 15917/2025 Dharamveer @ Palla S/o Phool Singh, R/o D-562, 563, 569, J.J. Colony, Inderpuri, Police Station Inderpuri, New Delhi. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 06/01/2026 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.135/2024 registered at Police Station Ravanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovery of alleged contraband article containing 567 Kg of poppy straw was effected from the other co- accused Rajkumar. It is alleged against the petitioner that the vehicle which escorted another vehicle from which recovery of alleged contraband article made was provided by the petitioner to the other co-accused namely: Rahul, Subhash, Lallan and Nilesh. It is also contended that there is no connectivity between the [2026:RJ-JP:79] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15917/2025] petitioner and the other co-accused Rahul, Subhash, Lallan and Nilesh or with the main accused Rajkumar. The petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2025 and charge-sheet has already been submitted, the same is taken on record. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the second bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the second bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 10 cases under various offences were registered, out of which 5 cases are registered under the NDPS Act. It is alleged against the petitioner that he provided his vehicle to the other co-accused Rahul, Subhash, Lallan and Nilesh in facilitating the transportation of commercial quantity of 567 Kg of poppy straw to another vehicle, therefore, considering the gravity of the offence, the second bail application of the accused- petitioner may be dismissed.. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the recovery of alleged contraband article 567 Kg of poppy straw was effected from the other co- accused Rajkumar and apart from the statement of owner of the vehicle, there is no substantive evidence available on record indicating the fact that the petitioner supplied the contraband article containing 567 Kg of poppy straw to the other co-accused Rajkumar and was involved in escorting the vehicle with the other co-accused namely: Rahul, Subhash, Lallan and Nilesh. Though, there are various cases registered against the petitioner, however, considering the above facts and also considering the fact that the recovery of contraband article was effected from the other co- [2026:RJ-JP:79] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15917/2025] accused Rajkumar from another vehicle, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Dharamveer @ Palla S/o Phool Singh, in connection with FIR No.135/2024 registered at Police Station Ravanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/10