1 HN, J W.P.No.38259_2013 APHC010207872013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38259/2013 Between: 1. B.PUSHPA, W/O ESWARAIAH,, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT (UNDER TERMINATION), KADIVEDU PANCHAYAT, NAGALAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR. 2. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/PROGRAMM OFFICER, N.R.E.G.S., NAGALAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 15t respondent in issuing proceedings No.K6/5368/2012, dated 18.2.2013 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Nat ral Justice and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.98, dated 9.3.2010, Circular No.143/SRDS/HR/Manual/2009, dated 27.1.2010, contrary to law laid down by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.14121 of 2009 and batch dated 7.7.2010 and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Field Assistant under National Rural Guarantee Employment Scheme to Kadivedu Grampanchayat, Nagalapuram Mandal, Chittoor District 2 HN, J W.P.No.38259_2013 with all consequential and incidental benefits attached to the post such as Seniority, back-wages etc., IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 47564 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No.K6/5368/2012, dated 18.2.2013 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 HN, J W.P.No.38259_2013 ORDER: 1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned proceedings passed by the Project Director. As per the impugned proceedings, an appeal lies before the District Collector within the time specified therein. 2. However, the petitioner has approached this Court without filing an appeal before the appellate authority. 3. In view of the above, this Court finds no grounds to interfere in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.38259_2013 151 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38259 of 2013 Date: 12.03.2026 NKA