APHC010207132004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 654 OF 2004 Between: 1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Superintendent Engineer, T.G.P.Circle, Cuddapah. ...Petitioner AND 1. B.Subba Naidu (Died) per L.Rs. respondents 2 to 5 2. B.Lakshminarayanamma, W/o.late B.Subba Naidu R/o.D.NO.12/320-e4, Vidyuth Nagar Extension, Ananthapur. 3. B Suresh Kumar @ Suresh Chowdary, S/o.late B.Subba Naidu R/o.D.NO.12/320-e4, Vidyuth Nagar Extension, Ananthapur. 4. B Chaitanya Lakshmi, D/o.Late B.Subba Naidu R/o.D.NO.12/320-e4, Vidyuth Nagar Extension, Ananthapur. 5. B Rajeswari, D/o.late B.Subba Naidu R/o.D.NO.12/320-e4, Vidyuth Nagar Extension, Ananthapur. ...Respondents A.S. against O.P.NO.15/2000, dated 15/3/02 on the file of District Judge,Cuddapah. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(CMP 24980 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To bring the following persons: 1.B.Lakshminarayanmma, 2.B.Suresh Kumar, 3.B.Chaitanya Lakshmi and 4.B.Rajeswari all are residents of D.NO.12/320-e4,Vidyuth Nagar Extension, Aananthapur as legal representatives of deceased sole respondent. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(ASMP 1463 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased receive the following documents as additional evidence in the present appeal: 1. Report dated 24.07.1997 by the five man committee constituted in G.O.Rt.No.490, Irrigation & CAD (P.W.T.B.P.) Department and 2. Inquiry Report on the charges framed against the officers of Irrigation & CAD Department on the work relating to Chitravathi Balancing Reservior, Anantapur District and mark them as Exhibits A-70 and A-71 Counsel for the Petitioner: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 20.01.2026, the following order was passed by this Court: “Pursuant to the order dated 15.12.2025, the office has submitted the report. According to which, respondent Nos.2 to 5 have been served, but they did not file a vakalat on their behalf. 2. At the request of Sri T.Vishnu Teja, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellant(s), post the matter in the next week for hearing under the same caption.” 2. Today, there is no representation for the appellant. The appeal is of the year 2004 and listed under the caption of ‘old matters’. 3. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Dt:27.01.2026 Rns THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT No: 654 of 2004 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Dt: 27.01.2026 Rns