Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20242 (AP)

P.V.Muralidhar Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy v. The Appellate Authority

WP/8453/2014 · 2026-03-01

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010203632014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8453/2014 Between: 1.P.V.MURALIDHAR REDDY, S/O. KRISHNA REDDY,,, AGED 28 YEARS, FIELD ASSISTANT (UNDER TERMINATION), GANGAVARAM (GP), KAMALAPURAM (M), Y.S.R. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY-CUM DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, KADAPA, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the PI respondent in dismissing the appeal of the petitioner in his Rc.No.4862/5 SA/ Kamalapuram (M), dated 14.09.2012 by confirming the removal order of the 2nd respondent without consideration of any explanation, any ground, any record only reproducing the subject of primary authority as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminative, misuse of official power, whimsical and fanciful and against statutory remedies and against Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside.the proceedings of the 1 st respondent in his Rc.No.4862/5 SA/Kamalapuram (M), dated 14.09.2012 by confirming the removal order of the 2nd respondent removing the petitioner as Field Assistant of Gangavaram Gram Panchayat in Kamalapuram Mandal, Y.S.R. District and pass such other order or orders ,as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 10554 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.8453 OF 2014 ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 3 18 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.8453 OF 2014 Dated 02.03.2026 KGM