APHC010198272016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 22288/2016 Between: 1. BALLA SITA MAHALAKSHI,, W/O. LATE PEDDA BALAIAH, AGE 72 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MANGALAGIRI WARD NO.11, MANGALAGIRI MUNICIPAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. SRI BHOGESWARA SWAMIVARI TEMPLE, KOLANUKONDA VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature or writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 and 4 in interfering to the petitioners land in Sy.No.51/1B an extent of Ac.2.00 situated at Kolanukonda Village of Tadepalli Mandal of Mangalagiri Sub Division, Guntur District is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 25 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents No.3 and 4 not to interfere to the petitioners land in Sy.No.51/1B an extent of Ac.2.00 situated at Kolanukonda Village of Tadepalli Mandal of Mangalagiri Sub Division, Guntur District IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 27402 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.3 and 4 not to interfere to the petitioners land in Sy.No.51/1B an extent of Ac.2.00 situated at Kolanukonda Village of Tadepalli Mandal of Mangalagiri Sub Division, Guntur District, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITON NO.22288 OF 2016 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 27.01.2026 BSP 31 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.22288 of 2016 27.01.2026 BSP