Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20233 (RAJ)

NASRAT ALI S/O SHRI REHMAT ALI v. WAKF BOARD

WRW/185/2024 · 2026-01-23

Sameer Jain

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3330] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 185/2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3357/2000 1. Nasrat Ali S/o Shri Rehmat Ali, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of P.o. Kanwas, Village Balapura, District Kota. 2. Nazamuddin Ansari S/o Shri Shamuddin Ansari, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Sarolawalon Ki Haveli Ke Pass, Shripura, Kota 3. Akhlak Hussin S/o Shri Hafiz Muzaffar, Aged About 59 Years 6 Months Resident Of C/o Javed Manzil, 20/150, Shripura, Kota 4. Mohammed Shahzad S/o Shri Harhak Ahmed, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of C/o Nihal Ahmed, Near Shahi Zama Masjid, Kodi, Kota. 5. Asadullah Beg S/o Shri Gajnaffar Ullah, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Kunhari, Kota. 6. Abdul Salim S/o Shri Bittal Khan, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Kishorepura, Kota. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Wakf Board, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Jalebi Chowk, Jaipur. 2. Wakf Committee, Through Its Administrator, Near Chambal Garden, Kota. 3. Abdul Sami S/o Shr. Abdul Shakur, Loco Colony, Kota Jn. Kota. 4. Nannu Khan S/o Shri Yasin Mohammed, Umar Colony, Chandraghata, Kota. 5. Abdul Rahim S/o Shri Mohammed Khan, C/o Nabi Mohammed, Driver Phed, Kare Kuwan Ke Pass, Bor Khora, Kota. 6. Anwar Ahmed S/o Shri Mohammed Yasin, Babu Bhai Compounder Ke Pass, Kiran Bazar, Chandragata, Kota. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:3330] (2 of 2) [WRW-185/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ishita Gambhir for Mr. Javed Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 23/01/2026 1. The present review petition has been filed against the order dated 28.02.2024, whereby SBCWP No.3357/2000 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that on account of personal reasons, he has not marked presence on 28.02.2024. It is submitted that the matter is of crucial nature and is ought to be heard on merits. 3. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondents has raised strong objections to the same. 4. Heard. 5. Upon a perusal a material available on record and plea made by learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is of a view that objection raised by learned counsel for the non- applicant/respondents are not legitimate. 6. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Accordingly, the order dated 28.02.2024 is recalled. 7. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3357/2000 is restored to its original number. 8. Let the matter be listed for final disposal on 10.02.2026 as pleadings are completed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /280