Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2023 (AP)

NALADI PRAVEEN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/12/2026 · 2026-05-06

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010706102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 12/2026 Between: 1. NALADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, S/O VENKATESWARLU, 38 YEARS, REVENDRAPADU VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL, DISTRICT, PRESENT WORKING AS PC 38 64 IN INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT, CRD A ZONE, MANDADAM. GUNTUR DISTRICT . 2. KURAGANTI SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O PANAKALU, 38 YEARS, MANGALAGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT, PRESENT WORKING AS PC 3755 IN INTELLIGENCE DEPARTMENT. GUNTUR DISTRICT, 3. KATTEVARAPU SATISH BABU, S/O SUBBARAO, 37 YEARS, KANCHARLAPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDALM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, , PRESENT WORKING AS PC 3802 IN CID, AP, MANGALAGIRI. 4. ORCHU VENKATESH, S/O MUSALAIAH, 35 YEARS, RAJUPALEM MANDAL PALNADU DISTRIC RESENT WORKING AS PC 385 2 IN NARASARAOPETA II TOWN PS OF PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. SURE RAMAKRISHNA,, S/O VENKATESWARLU, 42 YEARS, DUURGI VILLAGE AND MANDAL OF PALNADU DISTRICT, PRESENT WORKING AS PC 3900 IN NARASARAOPETA TRAFFIC PS PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. MADDIBOYINA KOTAM RAJU, S/O SUBBARAO, 36 YEARS, PINNIBOYINAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, BAPATLA MANDAL AND DISTRICT PRESENT WORKING AS PC 3711 IN KARLAPALEM PS OF BAPATLA DISTRICT. 2 VS, J W.P.No.12 of 2026 7. PALLAPU VENKATESWARLU,, S/O VEERA SWAMY, 41 YEARS, NAGAVARAM VILLAGE, KROSURU MANDAL OF PALNADU DISTRICT, PRESENT WORKINGAS PC 3795 IN TENALI III TOWN PS OF GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. ODARA VEERANAGULU, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, 35 YEARS, COBALDPETA, GUNTUR TOWN AND DISTRICT, PRESENT WORKING AS WPC 3942 IN CHILAKALURIPETA TOWN PS OF PALNADU DISTRICT. 9. LAKKU VENKATRAO, S/O BIKSHALU, 42 YEARS, CHILUVURU VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL OF GUNTUR DISTRICT, PRESENT WORKING AS PC 3775 IN VINUKONDA PS OF PALNADU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SOUTH CENTRAL JONE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA BAPATLA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus, declaring the impugned action of the Respondents is in revising the provisional seniority list through impugned notice c.no.76/Al/2024- 25 dated 22-10-2025 as illegal and arbitrary and violative of article 14 and 16 of the constitution of India consequently conform 3 VS, J W.P.No.12 of 2026 the provisional seniority list of apsparis (general) as on 01-01- 2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to consider petitioner objections dated 19- 11-2025 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the petitioners as respondents no 6 And 7 in Writ Petition No 12 of 2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SRINIVASULA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 4 VS, J W.P.No.12 of 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that pending the present writ petition, the respondent authorities have issued subsequent proceedings, which is under challenge before this Court, by way of filing a separate writ petition and as such, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 07.05.2026 KGR