Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20226 (JHR)

RAJ LOHAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6539/2026 · 2026-07-14

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:20768] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6539 of 2026 ------ Raj Lohar, aged about – 18 yrs, S/o- Gopal Lohar, R/o- Village – Manjhitola, Near Durga Mandir, P.O. + P.S.- Adityapur, District- Seraikella-Kharsawan .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate ------ Order No.03 Dated-14-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.67 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 109, 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant- Rajveer Singh. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-12 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the allegation of firing is against the co-accused Subham Sarkar. It is further submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para- 05 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State being assisted by the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.67 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-14.07.2026-Animesh/