Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20224 (RAJ)

AKHIL RAJASTHAN MAHILA EVAM BAL VIKAS SANYUKTA KARMCHARI SANGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18886/2025 · 2026-01-29

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4048] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18886/2025 Akhil Rajasthan Mahila Evam Bal Vikas Sanyukta Karmchari Sangh, Head Office Rampura Dabari Via Jaitpura, District Jaipur Through Its State President Smt. Rachna Sharma W/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 8, Gandhi Smarak Marg, Chaksu, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Women And Child Development, Government Of India, New Delhi. 3. The Director, Department Of Women And Child Development, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arjun Singh Khangarot For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 29/01/2026 1. Present petition is filed with the following prayers:- "(i) Declaring the action of the respondents in making payment of a meager amount as honorarium to the AWWs and AWHs working in different Anganwadi Centres of the State as illegal and unconstitutional and the respondents may be directed to make payment of Salary/honorarium to the AWWs and AWHs at par with Class-III and Class-IV employees working in the State Government. (ii) In the alternative directing the respondents to pay atleast minimum wages to the AWWs and AWHs under the Minimum Wages Act, 1972; (iii) Directing the respondents to consider the cases of AWWs and AWHs for regularization as a one time [2026:RJ-JP:4048] (2 of 2) [CW-18886/2025] measure on the posts of Class-III and Class-IV employees with all consequential benefits;" 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has filed various representations before the respondents but a deaf ear was given to the same. 3. Heard. 4. This Court directs the petitioner to file fresh representation along with relied upon case laws/judgments. Respondent No. 1 and 2 are directed to consider the abovesaid representation of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of 30 days from the date of passing of this order, strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with abovesaid directions. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /43