- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27515 CRL.P No. 7684 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7684 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. NAGARAJU K R S/O CHIKKARUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1042 KPTCL ROAD, BEHIND BATA SHOWROOM KAIKONDANAHALLI, SARJAPURA ROAD, BENGALURU 560 064. 2. Y M SOMASHEKAR S/O LATE MUDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT Y C CHIDANANDA BUILDING, ORANGAPPA STREET, BBMP OFFICE ROAD, NEAR OLD BUS STAND BENGLAURU 560 064. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. NIRIKSHA Y.M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI N GOWTHAM RAGHUNATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY YELAHANKA POLICE STATION, BENGLAURU 560 009 REP BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU 560 001. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27515 CRL.P No. 7684 of 2022 2. SMT. RENUKAMMA D/O LATE PARVATHAMMA W/O PARAMESH R/AT NO. 66/99 RAILWAY STATION ROAD, YELAHANKA OLD TOWN, YELAHANKA BENGALURU 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOUMYA R., HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO 1.QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS (ACCUSED NO.3 AND 4) IN C.C.NO.18021/2016 PENDING BEFORE THE 41st A.C.M.M., BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 380,415,416,419,420 R/W 34 OF IPC (ANNEXURE-B)2.QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FILED IN C.C.NO.18021/2016 (ANNEXURE-D) PENDING BEFORE THE 41st A.C.M.M., BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENE P/U/S 380,415,416,419,420 R/W 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27515 CRL.P No. 7684 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP for respondent no.1 - State submits that proceedings in present petition have ended in order of acquittal on 13.02.2025 in CC.no.18021/2016 on file of VII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, rendering above petition infructuous. 2. A memo is filed by learned HCGP to said effect. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo stating that petitioners do not wish to prosecute matter. 4. Taking memos on record, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54