SYED JAHEDABEGAM CHANDPASHA MULLA v. ABDUL QUADAR FATE MOHAMMAD INAMDAR AND OTHERS
CA/12020/2026 · 2026-10-13
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20223 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20223 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
973 CA NO. 12020 OF 2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 973 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12020 OF 2026 IN SA/638/2019 Syed Jahedabegam Chandpasha Mulla VERSUS Abdul Quadar Fate Mohammad Inamdar And Others ... Mr. Deshpande Gaurav L, Advocate for Applicant WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2019 ….
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 13.10.2026 P.C. :- SECOND APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2019
1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant.
2. The following substantial questions of law arise for determination: a. Whether the Trial Court and the Appellate Court were correct in giving findings on the filing of the suit within limitation ? b. Whether the findings recorded by the First Appellate Court regarding the possession of Fate Mohammad are legal and correct? c. Whether the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court failed to properly appreciate the issue of succession to the property of Fate Mohammad? 1 of 2
(( 2 )) 973 CA NO. 12020 OF 2026
3. Admit.
4. Issue notice to the Respondents.
5. Call Record and Proceedings.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12020 OF 2026
1. This is an application seeking permission to withdraw Second Appeal No.638 of 2019 to the extent of land bearing Block No.268 admeasuring 6 Hectares 05 Ares and Block No.339 admeasuring 1 Hectare 38 Ares, situated at village Nandgaon, Taluka and District Latur.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant.
3. Perused the application. Considering the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Accordingly. the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and disposed of.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2