(2026:JHHC:20782) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6542 of 2026 Ajay Kumar Verma, aged about 34 years, so of Deglal Mahato, r/o village – Domapahadi, PO – Motileda, PS – Bengabad, District – Giridih, Jharkhand. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr./s. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 14th July, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 324(2), 304(2), 351(1), 352, 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with co-accused person attempted to murder the informant, his nephew and Yogendra Prasad Verma by assaulting them with rod, sabbal (crowbar), lathi and tangi (axe) and by putting soil into his mouth in order to kill and committed theft of Rs. 20,000/-, gas stove, utensils as well as his Mobile Phone. It is next submitted the specific allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting with lathi only. It is next submitted that the genesis of the occurrence is land dispute. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 12 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Giridih, in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 14.07.2026 Aditi