Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2022 (AP)

Ms. Zamrud Sultana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/10506/2026 · 2026-05-04

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010197272026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 10506/2026 Between: 1. MS. ZAMRUD SULTANA, D/O. LATE B.GULAM NABI AGED 62 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE R/0.41/572/A, KOTHAPETA KURNOOL. - 518 001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRATERIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522238 2. THE KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KURNOOL REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER KURNOOL - 518 001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAFATH AHMED KHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri M.S.P. Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development and Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kurnool Municipal Corporation 2. Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kurnool Municipal Corporation, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Kurnool Municipal Corporation dated 04.05.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. The relevant portion of the Written Instruction is usefully extracted hereunder: “With reference to the subject cited, I am to inform you that, Ms.Zamrud Sulthana, Kurnool has filed WP No.10506/2026 before the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh, alleging that 2nd Respondent lay down road high handedly and illegally in the private land of the Petitioner in Sy No 79 to an extent of Ac 0 30 Cents situated at Zamrud Nagar Mamidalapadu without notice without land acquisition process. In this connection, I am to inform that, the Kurnool Municipal Corporation is not proposed road in the Petitioner' site, and also not called for any tenders for laying of road in the said Zamrud Nagar, Sy.No.79 of Mamidalapadu, Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool.” 3. The above extract would indicate that as of now, there is no proposal for road in the site belonging to the Writ Petitioner and the Respondents have not called for any tenders for laying of road in Zamrud Nagar, Sy.No.79 of Mamidalapadu, Kurnool Municipal Corporation. 3 4. Having so recorded, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction to the Respondent Authorities to follow the due process of law in future. 5. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:05.05.2026 Vns