SURENDRA SEN S/O SHRI PHOOLCHAND SEN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15931/2025 · 2026-01-12
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20219 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20219 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1086] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 15931/2025 Surendra Sen S/o Shri Phoolchand Sen, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Nangal Koju, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 12/01/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this 2nd bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.52/2025 registered at Police Station Amarsar, District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 178, 180 and 181 of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The only allegation levelled against the present petitioner pertains to providing photographs of fake currency to co-accused Sachin and there are no other allegations against him. No fake currency or any other printing material have been recovered from him. He further submits that the statements of material witnesses Jogendra Singh and Satish Parashar have been recorded and there are material
[2026:RJ-JP:1086] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15931/2025] contradictions therein. Though two cases have been reported as criminal antecedents against the petitioner but both are of different nature. He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 15.03.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Surendra Sen S/o Shri Phoolchand Sen, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/39