Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20215 (AP)

V.Chandrasekhar Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11290/2021 · 2026-03-06

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010198642021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11290/2021 Between: 1.V.CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY,, S/O. V.SRINIVASULU REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/AT. D.NO.19-277, RES CROSS STREET, EXTENSION MITTOOR, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELEGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALUQ POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioner nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. It is also pertinent to observe that the present case constitutes one of the oldest matters pending on the roster. The non- appearance of the Petitioner, despite the long pendency of the matter, reflects a lack of diligence. In view of the absence of representation and the failure to advance arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 07.03.2026 VTS