Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2021 (ALL)

SMT. NAGEENA BANO AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/18516/2026 · 2026-05-11

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18516 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. 1. Heard Sri Suresh Dhar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashwani Kumar Tripathi, learned C.S.C. for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India with the prayer to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to protect the peaceful matrimonial life, as husband and wife, of the petitioners from respondent no.4. 3. Learned CSC for the State pointed out that an FIR has been lodged with regard to the subject matter of the present case. Instructions in this regard has been received and the same is kept on record. The matter has become infructuous due to the aforesaid reason and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. May 12, 2026 Imtiyaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Smt. Nageena Bano And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad