Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20206 (AP)

Mota Ramakrishna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/12830/2020 · 2026-01-27

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010197892020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 12830/2020 Between: 1.MOTA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. D.NO.39-650-15, 12TH DIVISION, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2.MANDALA GIN KUMAR, S/O M.DASTAGIRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO. 39/650-16-17-18, PAKEERPALLI ROAD, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY.ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THESTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, , REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINNA CHOWK POLICE STATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7.THE TAHSILDAR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 8.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT RESPONDENT NOS.7 AND 8 ARE SUO MOTO IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 06.08.2020 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.DASARI S V V S V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Smt. K. Sree Lakshmi, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Dasari S.V.V.S.V. Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, on instructions, submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:28.01.2026 Vns