Dilwale 1 249-250-251-FA-817-16.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 249 FIRST APPEAL NO. 817 OF 2016 The State Of Maharashtra And Ors VERSUS Shaikh Maheboob Shaikh Balwand And Anr WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18047 OF 2010 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 817 OF 2016 The State Of Maharashtra And Ors VERSUS Shaikh Maheboob Shaikh Balwand And Anr ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. S. S. Dande … 250 FIRST APPEAL NO. 818 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18045 OF 2010 The State Of Maharashtra And Anr VERSUS Bhagwat Raghu Admane ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. A. M. Phule ... 251 FIRST APPEAL NO. 819 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18049 OF 2010 The State Of Maharashtra And Ors VERSUS Pandit Ganpati Admane ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. D. R. Korde ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. 2026:BHC-AUG:48794 Dilwale 2 249-250-251-FA-817-16.odt DATE : 07.10.2026 PER COURT : 1. Admit 2. As the acquisition proceeding is of the year 2001, the appeals are being heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties. 3. By these appeals, the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 07.08.2008 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Latur in LAR Nos.41, 48 and 49 of 2006, whereby the learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation. 4. The land of the claimants from village Borgaon Kale was acquired for the purpose of percolation tank no.10 of village Borgaon Kale. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, “the Act”) was published on 20.07.2001 award under Section 11 of the Act was passed on 17.04.2003, notice under Section 6 was issued on 15.09.2003. 5. Learned AGP submits that the compensation granted by the learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted by the SLAO. 6. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 3rd November 2016 with Corrigendum dated 23 February 2017 and 13th August 2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the Dilwale 3 249-250-251-FA-817-16.odt reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 7. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned award. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 8. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ]