S.Satyanarayana v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of
WP/21101/2014 · 2026-03-09
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20204 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20204 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
HN, J
W.P.No._21101_2014 APHC010194972014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21101/2014 Between:
1. S.SATYANARAYANA,, S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT, N.R.E.G.S, SARABAVARAM GRAMPANCHAYAT, ROLUGUNTA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH DEPARTMENT OF, PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT, II FLOOR, HUDA HERMITAGE OFFICE COMPLEX, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD -4, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/PROGRAMME, OFFICER, ROLUGUNTA MANDAL, VISKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the the Proceedings Rc.No.176/2014 (Human Resource Department) dt.01.07.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of Natural Justice, contrary to service conditions issued in circular No.143/SRDS/HR Manual/2009, dt.27.01.2010
2
HN, J
W.P.No._21101_2014 and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner filed assistant under National Rural Emplyee Guarantee Scheme to Sarabhavaram Panchayat, Rolugunta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District with all consequential and incidental benefits attached to the post and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 26460 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased issued by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.176/2014 (Human Resources Department) dt.01.07.2014 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 184232 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP)
3
HN, J
W.P.No._21101_2014 ORDER:
1. It is submitted that the cause of action in the present writ petition would no longer survive, inasmuch as the relief sought by the petitioner is for a direction to renew the contract. It is further submitted that the contract was terminated on account of allegations of misappropriation. 2.
It is also submitted that the work was subsequently entrusted to another contractor. As such, the cause in the writ petition would not survive any further. 3. Recording the same, the present writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:10.03.2026 NKA
4
HN, J
W.P.No._21101_2014 125 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO:21101 of 2014 Date: 10.03.2026
NKA