Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20201 (JHR)

SURAJ KARMALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1489/2025 · 2026-07-10

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20740 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1489 of 2025 ------ 1. Suraj Karmali, S/o Basdev Karmali, resident of Village Charhi, near Shiv Mandir, P.O. + P.S. Charhi, District Hazaribag. 2. Ajay Karmali, S/o Basdev Karmali, resident of Village Charhi, near Shiv Mandir, P.O. + P.S. Charhi, District Hazaribag. 3. Sandeep Karmali, S/o Basdev Karmali, resident of Village Charhi, near Shiv Mandir, P.O. + P.S. Charhi, District Hazaribag. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Land Acquisition Officer, Collectorate Campus, P.O. + P.S. Hazaribag Sadar, District Hazaribag, 825301, Jharkhand. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Md. Shadab Ansari, Advocate Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the O.P.(s) : Mr. Tarun Kr. Mahato, AC to AG ----- 05/ 10.07.2026 Heard the parties. 2. This Contempt case has been filed by the petitioners against non-compliance of order dated 17.07.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No.1780 of 2025. 3. The High Court vide the aforesaid order had only directed opposite party No.2 to dispose the representation of the petitioners. 4. The representation has already been disposed; thus no contempt is made out. 5. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is dropped. 6. If the petitioners are aggrieved by any part of the order, it will be open to them to challenge the same. 7. The opposite parties are expected to abide by the decision which they had taken on 07.08.2025, in compliance of the order of this Court. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 10th July, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 15.07.2026