CRWP-5875 IN THE (176 ) MANPREET STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o the official res petitioners at their represent 2. submitted tha 17.05.2026 be (Annexure P petition but the 5875-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da REET KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. S.K. Sira, Advocate for the pe Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec rs at the hands of respondents No. resentation dated 17.05.2026 (Annexu At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Senior Superintende re P-5) raising their grievances as but the same has not yet been consider JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5875-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
r the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the No.4 to 6 and to take action on nnexure P-5). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on ntendent of Police, Tarn Taran es as mentioned in the present nsidered and no action has been AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5875 taken thereon. would be satis Senior Superi representation 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro
18.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5875-2026 (O&M) (2) ereon. He further submitted that at e satisfied if appropriate directions are Superintendent of Police, Tarn Tara tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 17.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   that at this stage, the petitioners are issued to respondent No.2- n Taran to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. Sr. DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.