622-ABA-2004-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2004 OF 2026 Mohit Mahendra Agrawal …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Vivekanand Vinod Krishnan (Through Video Conferencing), for the Applicant. Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 15 OCTOBER 2026 PC:- 1. At the outset, Ms. Yadav, learned APP, for the Respondent- State, states that there are two criminal antecedents against the Applicant and they have not been disclosed in the Anticipatory Bail Application. 2. In view of the said contention raised by learned APP, Mr. Vivekanand Krishnan, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Anticipatory Bail Application by giving the details of all the antecedents. 3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with leave as aforesaid. Page 1 Arjun 622-ABA-2004-2026.DOC 4. It is clarified that the contentions of both the sides are expressly kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Arjun