( 2026:JHHC:20838 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6566 of 2026 ------ 1. Abdul Gaffar Ansari, aged about 51 years, S/o Alim Ansari, 2. Hazrat Ansari, aged about 45 years, S/o Alim Ansari, 3. Umar Faruque Ansari, aged about 62 years, S/o Alim Ansari, 4. Tanweer Alam, aged about 16 years, S/o Hazrat Ansari, All are R/o Vill-Niche Tola, Husir, P.S.-Kanke, Post-Hussir, Dist.-Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Shekhur Rahman, Advocate : Mr. Wazid Ali, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated- 14-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.100 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 126(2), 308(2), 308(4), 351(2), 189(2), 189(4), 191(2), 191(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder the informant and his associates by assaulting them with Lathi, Danda, Sword and Battle Axe. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is then submitted that for the self-same occurrence, the petitioner no.1 has instituted Kanke P.S. Case No.101 of 2026 and there was free-fight between the parties. It is further submitted that the persons of both sides have sustained injury and the petitioners have no intention to kill anyone and the petitioners acted in self-defence. It is also submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-17 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 17.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-09 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.100 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 14/07/2026 Abhiraj/