2026:HHC:11234 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 4888 of 2026 Decided on : 09.04.2026 Ms. Ditti …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order and by affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, within a period of 8 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. In the course of deciding the representation, if the Authority finds favour with the prayer made by the petitioner, then it goes without saying that transfer shall be effected only after the ban on the transfers on account of the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:11234 Panchayati Raj Election is lifted by the State. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 09, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)