[2026:RJ-JP:69] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18350/2025 1. Padam Chand Son Of Shri Kalu Singh Kothari, Resident Of Oswali Mohalla, Madanganj-Kishangarh, Tehsil Kishangarh, Distt. Ajmer. 2. Smt. Premlata Wife Of Shri Padam Chand, Resident Of Oswali Mohalla, Madanganj-Kishangarh, Tehsil Kishangarh, Distt. Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Hanuman Singh Son Of Shri Amar Singh, 2. Ganpat Singh Son Of Shri Amar Singh, 3. Mst. Antar Kanwar Widow Of Shri Raghuveer Singh, 4. Narendra Singh Son Of Shri Raghuveer Singh, 5. Mahendra Singh S/o. Raghuveer Singh, Minor, 6. Poonam Kanwar D/o. Raghuveer Singh, Minor, No.5 and 6 Minors Through Natural Guardian Mother Antar Kanwar Widow Of Shri Raghuveer Singh. 7. Pratap Singh Son Of Shri Tej Singh, 8. Lalita Kanwar D/o. Shri Tej Singh, 9. Shrawan Singh Son Of Shri Tej Singh, 10. Prem Kanwar D/o. Shri Tej Singh, 11. Uchaab Kanwar Wife Of Shri Roop Singh, 12. Manju Kanwar D/o. Shri Roop Singh, 13. Sanju Kanwar D/o. Shri Roop Singh, 14. Gajendra Singh Son Of Shri Roop Singh, 15. Rajendra Singh Son Of Shri Roop Singh, All Resident Of Dhani Rathoran, Mandanganj Kishangarh, Tehsil Kishangarh, Distt. Ajmer. ----Respondents 16. Ramratan Son Of Shri Noratmal, 17. Swaroop Chand Son Of Shri Rameshwarlal, No.16 and 17 are Resident Of Agra Gate, Ajmer, Tehsil And Distt. Ajmer. 18. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Kishangarh, Distt. Ajmer. ----Proforma Respondents/Defendants [2026:RJ-JP:69] (2 of 3) [CW-18350/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi for Ms. Anita Aggarwal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 06/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- i) Quash and set aside the order dated 21.11.2024 passed by the learned Board of Revenue in Appeal No.1400/2020 whereby the interim order was passed in favour of the plaintiff/ respondents and direct the learned Board of Revenue to expeditiously decide the appeal in a month's time. ii) Any other relief which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners in all fairness submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if the learned Board of Revenue is directed to decide the pending appeal No.1400/2020 expeditiously, preferably, within a time-bound manner. 3. Heard and considered the submissions so advanced and also perused the material available on record. 4. From the record of the case, it is reflected that the learned Board of Revenue has heard final arguments on various occasions and reserved the judgment in the said appeal, however, every time the final judgment was not pronounced, and the matter was released. [2026:RJ-JP:69] (3 of 3) [CW-18350/2025] 5. It was also informed to this Court that the Board of Revenue had also reheard final arguments in appeal No.1400/2020 and the judgment was reserved in the month of November, 2025. 6. In that view of the matter, the learned Board of Revenue is directed to decide the pending appeal No.1400/2020, within a period of one month from the date of receiving the certified copy of this Order. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. 8. Any other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /3