Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20182 (AP)

Bayyavarapu Krishna Veni v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/15510/2021 · 2026-01-26

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010193742021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15510 OF 2021 Between: 1. BAYYAVARAPU KRISHNA VENI,, W/O BALA CHANDRASEKHAR, HINDU, CULTIVATION, AGE 50 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KRAPA, AINAVILLI MANDAL, E.G.DT.'533216 2. GANJI CHANDRA RAO,, S/O VENKATANANDAM, HINDU, CULTIVATION, AGE 62 YEARS, RESIDENT OF NEAR MAHALAKSHMAMMA TEMPLE. KRAPA, AINAVILLI MANDAL, E.G.DT, 533216 3. VARREY JAGANADHAM,, S/O SWAMY NAIDU, HINDU, CULTIVATION, AGE 60 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KRAPA, AINAVILLI MANDAL, E.G.DT 533216 4. SANABOINA MALLIKARJUNA RAO,, S/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, CULTIVATION, AGE 50 YEARS, EX-VILLAGE PRESIDENT, KRAPACHINTALAPUDI, MUMMIDIVARAM MANDAL, E.G.DT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUD, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, E.G.DT, KAKINADA 4. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, AMALAPURAM 2 5. THE TASHILDAR, MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, AINAVILLI 6. THE M P D O, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, AINAVILLI 7. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION, AMALAPURAM 8. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, VILLAGEL SECRETARIAT, KRAPA, AINAVILLI MANDAL 9. M/S KALYANI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP' BY ANJANEYA REDDY, CONTRACTOR, MAIN ROAD RAVULAPALEM, E.G.DT MOBILE NO.984100033 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BANDA VENKATA SUBRAMANYESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following order : Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was listed 20.01.2026, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners. It seems the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 27.01.2026 BSK 3 28 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15510 OF 2021 Date: 27.01.2026 BSK