Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20181 (CHH)

VIJAY PRAKASH SINGH v. ROHINI SULTANIYA

CRR/445/2026 · 2026-05-14

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23269 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No.445 of 2026 Vijay Prakash Singh S/o Late Raj Narayan Singh, Aged About 46 Years R/o Infront Of Mission School, Beside The Street Of Marghatti, Mission Road, Ratakhar, Korba, Thana- City Kotwali, Distt.- Korba (Chhattisgarh) ... Applicant versus Rohini Sultaniya D/o Ashwani Sultaniya Aged About 52 Years R/o Ward No. 06, Near Saptadev Temple, Tehsil And Distt.- Korba (Chhattisgarh) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant :Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate. For Non-Applicant :Shri Ujjwal Agrawal, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 15.05.2026 1. The present Revision filed by the Applicant under Section 438/422 of BNSS, 2023 against the judgment dated 17.03.2026 SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2026.05.15 17:19:09 +0530 2 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Korba, District Korba in Criminal Appeal No.129/2025, affirming the judgment dated 14.11.2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Korba, District Korba in Criminal Case No.2425/2022 whereby, the Applicant/accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (for short 'N.I. Act') and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 1 year with compensation/fine amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Six lacs) and in default of paying compensation/fine, to undergo additional S.I. for 6 months. 2. Learned Counsel for the parties submit that amicable settlement took place between the parties and in that behalf, an application has been moved before this Court stating therein that the parties have compromised the matter amicably. 3. Heard on I.A. No.03/2026, an application under Section 147 of the NI Act for compounding the offence under Section 138 of the said Act, wherein it has been stated that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and no dispute with regard to the cheque amount remains any longer. 4. Upon due consideration of the reasons assigned therein, the same is allowed. 5. In view of settlement arrived between the parties, I see no reason to keep this matter pending. 3 6. Accordingly, the conviction under Section 138 of N.I. Act and sentence awarded thereunder are hereby set aside consequent upon settlement arrived at between the parties. 7. Consequently, the Revision stands disposed of. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Priya