Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20179 (DEL)

SH SHRAY KAUSHIK AND ORS v. SH NIHAL CHAND

RC.REV./367/2026 · 2026-09-25

Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010462892026 + RC.REV. 367/2026 & CM APPL. 66642/2026 (Ex. From filing certified copies of annexures) SH SHRAY KAUSHIK AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhinav Tyagi and Mr. Divyansh Singh, Advs. versus SH NIHAL CHAND .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw & Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advs. Ms. Anju Agarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 25.09.2026 1. The present Revision Petition has been filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, [“DRC Act”], in respect of the Tenanted premises, being One Room along with W.C. Bath, Kitchen/Lobby on the First Floor (private no. 30) in property bearing no. 683 at Katra Hardayal (also known as 676/683 at Katra Hira Lal) Chandni Chowk Delhi - 110006 [“Subject Premises”], seeking the following reliefs: “a. Set aside the impugned Order / Judgment dated 16.03.2026 passed by the Court of Ld. ACJ-cum- Additional Rent Controller(Central), Tis Hazari Courts: Delhi, in Eviction Petition No.138/25, titled as „Sh. Nihal Chand v. Sh. Shray Kaushik & Ors.‟ whereby the Leave to Defend under Section 25-B(5) of Delhi Rent Control Act on behalf of Respondents against an eviction This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 11:35:21 Petition under Section 14 (1) (e) in respect of the tenanted premises i.e. One Room along with W.C. Bath, Kitchen/Lobby on the First Floor (private no. 30) in property bearing no. 683 at Katra Hardayal (also known as 676/683 at Katra Hira Lal) Chandni Chowk Delhi 110006, the Certified Copy of which is annexed herewith as Annexure 1 filed by the Revisionist herein above against the Respondent herein above;…” 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, after advancing submissions for a sufficient period of time, on instructions, submit that the parties have arrived at an arrangement. 3. Learned counsel for the parties, on instructions from their respective parties, submit that the following arrangement has been arrived at inter se the parties: I. Petitioner shall continue to occupy the Subject Premises till 30.04.2027. II. Petitioner shall pay as rent, Rs. 15,000/- per month to the Respondent from today, up to the date of the vacation of the Subject Premises, which shall be on or before 30.04.2027. 4. The Petitioner shall file an Affidavit of Undertaking, incorporating the aforesaid terms of arrangement mutually arrived at inter se the parties. The said Affidavit shall be filed within a period of two (02) weeks from today, failing which, the Petitioners would be liable to vacate the Subject Premises forthwith. 5. It is made clear that, in the event of non-compliance of the aforesaid terms of the arrangement and/or the corresponding aforesaid Affidavit by the Petitioner, the Respondent shall be at liberty to take such steps as are available to him under law, inter alia, initiation of Contempt proceedings. 6. In view of the mutual arrangement arrived at between the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 11:35:21 parties, the present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands disposed of in aforementioned terms. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 25, 2026/v/DJ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/09/2026 at 11:35:21