APHC010196652012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2089/2012 Between: 1. KAZA KISHORE KUMAR, S/O. ANJANEYA PRASAD, TEACHJER Z.P.HIGH SCHOOL, TAMMAVARAM VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KOVVURI SUBBA REDDY, S/o. Veerragava Reddy, Kutukuluru Village, Anaparti Mandal, East Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRPMP 2809 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the docket order dt. 6-2-2012 passed in EA NO. 257 of 2011 EP No. 56 of 2009 in OS No. 46 of 2004 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Anaparthi, East Godavari District pending disposal of the CRP. IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CRPMP 7137 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dt. 11-10-2012 and restore the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GOVIND REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Civil Revision Petition, filed under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘C.P.C’), is preferred by the petitioner/J.Dr, against the docket order dated 06.02.2012 passed by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Anaparthi, East Godavari District, (for short, ‘the Trial Court’), in E.A.No.257 of 2011 in E.P.No.56 of 2009 in O.S.No.46 of 2004. By the said order, the Trial Court directed the garnishee to deduct a sum of Rs.2,000/- per month from the salary of J.Dr towards satisfaction of the warrant amount. 2. A perusal of the proceeding sheets reveals that though the matter was listed under the caption for dismissal, there was no representation for the petitioner on 27.02.2026. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. As per the endorsement in the cause list, the notice sent to the respondent has not been returned. Despite repeated opportunities to appear and advance the case, the petitioner remained absent. It thus appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter before this Court. 3. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 09.03.2026 SAK 212 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2089/2012 Date: 09.03.2026 SAK