Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20173 (KAR)

SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR v. SRI. G S KEMPEGOWDA

CRL.RP/821/2020 · 2026-06-11

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28139 CRL.RP No. 821 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.821 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O. RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, COOLIE AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. HARIDASANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572227. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.H. DAYANANDA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. G.S. KEMPEGOWDA, S/O. LATE SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O. SARASWATHIPURAM, TURUVEREKERE TOWN, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572227. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.B.CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.04.2017 PASSED IN THE CRIMINAL CASE AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.07.2020 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.10013/2017 ON THE FILE OF V ADDITIONAL Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28139 CRL.RP No. 821 of 2020 DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TIPTUR, AND TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the revision petitioner is absent. The learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. This Court vide order dated 05.01.2021 suspended sentence, subject to depositing 50% of cheque amount before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks and the same has not been complied with. This matter is of the year 2020 and not yet admitted. Hence, the question of considering the revision petition does not arise, in view of non-compliance of conditional order passed by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1