IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41262 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-277 Year-2026 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Vikash Kumar S/o Bijay Prasad R/o Village- Ballopur, PS- Warsaliganj, Distt.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No. 277 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 336(2), 111, 338, 340(2), 61(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 read with Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) & 66 of the I.T. Act, 2000. 3. As per the prosecution case, a mobile phone was seized from the possession of the petitioner, which was found in the name of one Raushan Kumar. Customer data-sheet of two pages has also been seized from the possession of the petitioner. C.D.R. of the seized mobile shows a large number of calls and SMS has been made at short interval. The self-inculpatory statement of the co-accused also shows that the petitioner is involved in cyber fraud. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41262 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2026 having clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submits that this is a case of cybercrime and individuals involved in such offences should not be shown leniency. 6. Considering the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. 8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner. sadique/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T