Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20169 (CHH)

DHARAM PRAKASH TOPPO v. SHIVLAL TIGGA

MAC/814/2026 · 2026-05-07

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 814 of 2026 1 - Dharam Prakash Toppo S/o Charku Toppo Aged About 52 Years (Wrongly Mention In The Order As 60 Years) R/o Village- Dhanoura Khutenpara P.S, Darima Distt- Surguja (C.G.) (Owner Of The Vehicle But Wrongly Mention In The Order As Driver Of Vehicle) ... Appellant versus 1 - Shivlal Tigga S/o Late Devnath Tigga Aged About 40 Years R/o Village - Village- Dhanoura Khutenpara P.S. Darima Distt- Surguja (C.G.) 2 - Maniye Tigga W/o Shivlal Tigga Aged About 38 Years R/o Village - Village- Dhanoura Khutenpara P.S. Darima Distt- Surguja (C.G.) 3 - Rajkumari S/o Shivlal Tigga Aged About 20 Years R/o Village - Village- Dhanoura Khutenpara P.S. Darima Distt- Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Simoun Tigga S/o Late Shivlal Tigga Aged About 11 Years Respondent No 4 Is Minor Through The Natural Guardian Father Shivlal Tigga R/o Village - Village- Dhanoura Khutenpara P.S. Darima Distt- Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Harkesh Kumar Yadav S/o Devse Yadav Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Goreya Pipar Puta P.S. Darima Distt- Surguja (C.G.) 6 - S.B.I. General Insurance Company Limited 9th Floor A And B Bings Buisness Center Town Road Ashoknagar Andheri (East) Mumbai (Maharastra) ... Respondent(s) BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.05.11 10:52:15 +0530 2 For Appellant : Ms. Aakancha Vishwakarma, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 08/05/2026 1. This appeal u/s 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed against the award dated 14.10.2025 passed by the 6th Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) in Motor Accident Claim Case No.215/2024. 2. Heard on I.A. No.03/2026 for withdrawal of appeal. 3. On due consideration, I.A. No.03 is allowed and the appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai