MANOJ KUMAR JAIN S/O SHRI MANGAL CHAND JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18424/2025 · 2026-01-28
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20165 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20165 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3875] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18424/2025
1. Manoj Kumar Jain S/o Shri Mangal Chand Jain, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 7, Sarpanch Vatika, Near Gupteshwar Mahadev Mandir, Golyawas, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Sudhir Kumar Jain S/o Shri Prakash Chand Jain, Aged About 58 Years, R/o A-71, Jda Colony, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur- 302017
3. Anjali Sharma W/o Shri Chhagan Lal Sharma, Aged About 56 Years, R/o G-9, Nandpuri, Swejfarm, Sodala, Jaipur- 302019 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan
2. Director (Non-Gazetted), Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 28/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the
judgment passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21214/2017, titled Om Prakash & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 21.11.2017 (Annexure-3), and submitted that the instant petition can be decided in light of the same.
[2026:RJ-JP:3875] (2 of 2) [CW-18424/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents–State has not refuted the contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners.
3. In view of the above and in light of the judgment passed in Om Prakash (supra), the present petition stands disposed of in the same terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/57