Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20163 (AP)

P.Ramabhadra Naidu v. Sri Karikal Vallabhan, IAS

CC/992/2015 · 2026-02-25

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010198492015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 992/2015 Between: 1. P.RAMABHADRA NAIDU, S/O LATE P.DORASWAMI NIADU, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR (T), HOUSING, YADAMARI MANDAL (MANDAL INCHARGE), CHITTOOR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KARIKAL VALLABHAN IAS, S/o. not known, Age: not known, Managing Director, A.P. State Housing Corporation, Urdugalli, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the respondents and punish him for his willful and deliberate disobedience in not complying with the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.4263/2015 dt: 24-2-2015 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 4705 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. K MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY 2. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Contempt Case No:992 of 2015 The Court made the following Order: The present contempt case is filed alleging non-implementation and willful disobedience of the interim orders dated 24.02.2015 passed in W.P No.4263 of 2015. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, at the first instance, Mr. T.Dharma Teja, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through virtual mode, submitted that the respondents have not complied with the interim orders of this Court in toto and that the main writ petition itself is disposed of on 24.04.2018. 3. Conversely, the learned Standing Counsel, Mr. K.Malliarjuna Moorthy, while furnishing a copy of the instructions vide RC.No.A2/WP.No.18608/2021 dated 25.02.2026 issued by the General Manager (A & V), A.P.State Housing Corporation, Vijayawada, for perusal of this Court. 4. Basing upon said instructions, he vehemently submits that initially, the petitioner was appointed as Technical Work Inspector on Nominal Muster Rolls basis in the year 1986 and subsequently, the petitioner was promoted as Assistant Engineer with effect from 08.02.2020 vide Procds.No.A2/165/2018 dated 08.02.2020. Thereafter, the petitioner retired from service on 31.08.2022 and also the respondent authorities have also paid the retiremental benefits to the petitioner. A copy of the said instructions is placed on record. 5. After receiving a copy of the said instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the interim orders passed by this Court in the writ petition are fully complied with. 6. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides and as the orders dated 24.02.2015 in W.P No.4263 of 2015 are complied with in toto, accordingly, the present contempt case is closed. 7. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date:26.02.2026 Ksj 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Contempt Case No:992 of 2015 26th February, 2026 Ksj IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI Contempt Case No:992 of 2015 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02. 26.02.2026 MRK,J This Contempt Case is closed. (Vide Separate Order) B/o. Ksj