Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20161 (PAT)

Sunil Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./33145/2026 · 2026-06-19

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33145 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2024 Thana- NEORA District- Patna ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Son of Satrudhan Yadav @ Satrudhan Rai R/O Bindeshwari Patliputra Polytechnic, Opposite Sai Mandir, P.S.- Patliputra, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravish Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 19-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Neora P.S. Case No. 134 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 309(4) and 103 of the B.N.S. read with Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, some unknown criminals had shot the son of the informant. The motorcycle number of the criminals was given to the informant by the local people. The name of the petitioner has come during investigation. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. The name of the petitioner has come in self-inculpatory Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33145 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026 2/2 statement of one Vikash Kumar @ Maddy from whom, the motorcycle used in the crime has been recovered. The petitioner is in custody since 23.09.2025 having clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the seriousness of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. 8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner. sadique/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T