(2026:JHHC:20676) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6492 of 2026 Lal Babu @ Lal Babu Yadav, aged about 27 years, old son of Laxman Yadav, resident of village – Chhota Panchgarh, PO & PS – Jirwabari, District – Sahibganj. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl. P.P. : Mr. Piyush Pallav, Advocate ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 13th July, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jirwabari P.S. Case No. 58 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 351(2) of the B.N.S. along with Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder Shiv Kumar Mandal by firing upon him. By drawing attention of this Court to the certified copy of the compromise petitioner jointly filed by the informant – victim and the petitioner in the Court of learned C.J.M., Sahibganj it is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the victim and informant that therein it has categorically been mentioned that the informant has not seen the occurrence and the victim has not seen the petitioner at the time of occurrence. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the implication of the petitioner in this case is because of mistaken identity. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., yet without putting him on T.I. Parade, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 12 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj, in connection with Jirwabari P.S. Case No. 58 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 13.07.2026 Aditi