G.V.S.V.T.Suryanarayana Sharma v. Sri G.Balaramaiah
CC/14/2013 · 2026-03-31
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20149 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20149 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010198442013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 14/2013 Between:
1. G.V.S.V.T.SURYANARAYANA SHARMA, S/O LATE ANNAPURNAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC:ADHARVANA VEDA PARAYANDAR GR-II, S.V.S.DEVASTHANAM, DWARAKA TIRUMALA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI G BALARAMAIAH, COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD.
2. SRI M V S S VISHNU PRASAD, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM, DWARAKA TIRUMALA (CHINNA TIRUPATHI), WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to deal the respondents in accordance with law for violating the interim orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No.40484 of 2010 in W.P.No. 31843 of 2010 dated 20.12.2010, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL 6 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the services of the 2nd
2
respondent temple as Adharvana Vedaparayandar Grade-II, pending final disposal of the contempt case, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
2. E SAMBASIVA PRATAP The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.31843 of 2010 was dismissed by this Court by an order dated 07.07.2015. In view of the said dismissal, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings.
2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date:01.04.2026 PNS