CRWP No.5887
IN TH 176 Deva and a State of Ha CORAM: Present: SUMEET G 1. By w Constitution the official respondent N 2. Notic 3. On th accepts noti 4. As pe wishes of members/re 5. Both upon their A Deva is 6.4. 5887 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ***** and another v. Haryana and others AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SU Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate --- EET GOEL, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed itution of India, the petitioners are see fficial respondents to protect their lif ndent Nos.4 to 8. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 On the asking of the Court, Mr. Gu ts notice on behalf of the official respo As per the petitioners, they have ma s of respondent Nos. 4 to 8, wh ers/relative of the petitioners. Both the petitioners have claimed th their Aadhar Cards indicating that da 6.4.2004 and petitioner No.2-Huls -1-
UNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP No.5887 of 2026 Date of decision: 18.5.2026 Date of uploading : 18.5.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents CE SUMEET GOEL vocate for the petitioners filed under Article 226 of the are seeking issuance of directions to eir life and liberty at the hands of s No.1 to 3. r. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana, l respondents. ave married on 8.5.2026 against the , who happen to be the family med themselves to be major relying that date of birth of petitioner No.1- Hulshi is 25.3.2008.
2026 2026 2026 the ns to ds of , t the mily lying - ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.18 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.5887
6. Witho also the me to direct res the represen submitted b two weeks f 7. Keepi married aga respondent of the petiti other conce may endeav 8. Liber this order on 9. Howe other case, t taking lawfu 10. The p shall also sta 18.5.2026 Ashwanii 5887 of 2026 Without commenting on the legality he merits of contentions raised in the ect respondent No.2-Commissioner of presentation dated 12.5.2026 (Annex itted by the petitioners & pass approp eeks from today. Keeping in view the fact that both ed against the wishes of their family ndent No.2- Commissioner of Police, petitioners as well as the parents of concerned family members in his/he ndeavour to resolve their dispute(s) an Liberty is reserved in favour of privat rder on showing sufficient cause. However, if the petitioners are found case, then this order shall not preclude lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. P also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2-
gality and validity of the marriage as in the petition, I deem it appropriate of Police, Faridabad, to look into Annexure P-5) stated to have been appropriate orders thereupon within both the petitioners claim to have family(s), I direct that if possible, olice, Faridabad may call a meeting nts of both the petitioners and their his/her presence so that the parties e(s) and live amicably. private respondents to seek recall of found to have been involved in any reclude the competent authority from ners. of. Pending application(s), if any, (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
ge as riate into been ithin have sible, eting their arties all of any from any, ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.18 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document