Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20147 (JHR)

PRINCE KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6460/2026 · 2026-07-13

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:20615 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6460 of 2026 ------ Prince Kumar, aged about 20 years, son of Birju Mahto, resident of Village-Cheriya Bariyarpur, P.O. & P.S.-Cheriya Bariyarpur, Dist.-Begusarai (Bihar) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 13.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sector-04 P.S. Case No.02 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 310(2)/ 312/ 331(3)/ 205/ 111/ 336(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity in the jewellery shop by impersonating themselves as police officers at the point of fire arms but upon activation of alarm system, the petitioner along with the co-accused person fled away from the place of occurrence i.e. from the jewellery shop of the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.12 of the bail application, charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.02.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro, in connection with Sector-04 P.S. Case No.02 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 13.07.2026 Gunjan-